keppn

The dynamic placement tools introduced in S24 are reaaally useful to me. It saves a lot of time AND it's super fun to use. I wish 3D DCCs would adopt more tools that have this natural "real world"-feeling to them.

You just have to put in your love.

The "Volume Mesher" has this really elegant and simple solution of a "Cache-Layer". For me, this is much more tidy than to manually organize parametric and baked versions. I wish Maxon would implement this for every performance-eating object. Or, even better, on a layer-basis. Or, even betterer, just a big, shiny button "Just cache everything in here!"

Oh... well that's... totally not my cup of tea 🙂 While the animation is okayish, the look is just soulless.

Interesting list. I have no clue about the archviz-scene, yet I assumed Arnold would be a top engine here. Arnold's results just *look* so archvizzy 😅

Yeah, I'm guilty of wandering off, too, even far into the valley of photography or the jungle of traditional arts. Sometimes I wonder what would have been, should I have chosen a more narrow field of expertise. But then again, being more of a generalist sometimes unlocks synergistic bonus skill points 🙂 For example, it was really nice when renderers introduced classic photographic terms like aperture etc., because I hit that floor running 🙂 Aa-aand: Sometimes I just need a change and a fresh perspective, and jumping between disciplines gives me just that.

Chris is just an endless fountain of surprising techniques. The way he casually drops the hint, that you can funnel OM object color as userdata into a shader... why do I never think of such things! Just an amazing guy. I wonder how much time he spends in C4D per day 😄

What an accomplishment! Well done 🥳

Speaking of JangaFX's roadmap and Plans for Liquigen: There's no timeline for Liquigen There are no feature goals yet, they seem to be in the early phase of R&D They will focus on small-scale stuff first (splashes, etc.) So, maybe they posted the teaser a bit early 🙂

Not sure if OBJ works, but you can import Alembics and FBX, even animated ones. Objects can be set to emitters or colliders. Right now, there's a restriction to ONE object though, which is of course very limiting. But: I managed to export a simulated debris field with a floor as a single animated mesh in FBX-Format to Embergen; The Emission Node then allows to select which of the "sub-meshes" should emit and which not, and I could also set the floor as a collider via the collisions node. In same cases, that's enough of a workaround. It is somewhat of a hurdle though. Nick from JangaFX said, that multiple imported objects are targeted for the 2022 roadmap.

To science! 😄

Well, to be honest, I didn't have a point at all when starting the thread. Just an interesting tech preview 🙂 But it evolved quite naturally to the discussion of workflows and simulation solutions, so, why not continue? 🙂 It's always interesting to read different approaches and perspectives. Dave, for you the interoperability of simulation systems is a high priority, and also continous control without caching or baking steps. Totally valid point, I mean, you know best what kind of work you want to do and how you want to achieve it 🙂 For me, I welcome every development that allows for a more playful exploration of possibilities. Coming from traditional arts, I value immediate feedback and friendly UIs that hide the deep tech from me. It's still seldom, but realtime stuff sometimes even bestows upon me the "happy accident". So, it's nice that there are different solutions with different approaches available for different kind of artists. I didn't mean to bash X-Particles, it's still a great tool and I use it quite often for Particle work. What I honestly don't know at all: Can a plugin escape the performance frame set by the DCC? So, could GPU support really make a difference for X-Particles, if it needs to constantly talk to "old" parts of Cinema 4D? I surely do hope so! On the other hand, a fresh start with a very modern standalone app seems to grant a massive head start in terms of raw performance. (With the obvious disadvantages like caching, etc.) In the end, everyone needs to evaluate for himself and make his own decisions... and I enjoy talking about that kind of stuff a lot 🙂

Ah, interesting view, and also a nice move back on topic - liquids 🙂 Yes, multiple physics interactions in one system with good performance really is the simulation endgame. I wonder which package/platform/plugin will arrive there first? X-Particles is already there, functionality wise. They really need a huge performance gain, though, and I'm not sure, if they can break free from plugin-restrictions. Also, wasn't GPU support promised for late 2020? I just hope they get there some day... Houdini is also there, and it also has the performance. I'm really not willing to learn that thing, though 😅 JangaFX... hm, Embergen is peerless for the reasons mentioned above, but I doubt they will go for multi-physics-systems. It seems, Embergen and Liquigen will be specialized realtime-tools for specific jobs, in their respective silos. I have no idea about Blender's competitiveness in this area. Seeing Blender's overall development, it surely ain't too bad 😄 Nextlimit... oh boy, Realflow for C4D was such a bad buy. It's nowhere near the capabilities of the standalone, only geared towards really small product shots etc. Also, they do feature GPU support inside C4D and... it doesn't do that much. Maaaaybe Maxon will totally suprise us someday with a fully integrated solution based on their highly performant scene-nodes? Who knows...

Lot of words, but here's a simple example: In this short clip I draggeed down the slider for the amount of smoke emitted. It's so satisfying when you get the setting "just right" with immediate feedback: https://imgur.com/kF3HAYb

Hi Dave, I understand your point completely, and in fact, it was my point of view not so long ago: "Why should I integrate another external tool with all the hassle of importing/exporting and keeping track of separate simulation files? Even more though, when I already shelled out a considerable amount of cash for an integrated solution (I own X-Particles, too)." Well, for me it's all about the quality of work you do in step 3. Here's an example: In Embergen, I very quickly get a desired result and then spend most of the time really finetuning my simulation. Not much technical knowledge is needed to keep everything fluid and fun. Typically, at the end of a session I think: "Yeah, whoa, that's perfect" (btw, I don't care about the shading in Embergen at all, since I have to redo that in Redshift anyway.) In X-Particles, it always begins kind of fluid, but very soon the simulation becomes so slow, that I can only dial in a dozen of artistic changes. Before it becomes just too frustrating to wait.. dial in... wait... Typically, at the end of a session I think: "Yeah, whatever, that needs to do it now". (Btw, Insydium has fantastic video-tutorials, but Bob always dials in the right values *BEFORE* seeing the effect, because he's just an expert. If you don't reach that kind of expertise, it's too easy to really fall into performance-pits left and right.) For me, it has been quite an expensice way to come to the conclusion: Simulation-Plugins just don't cut it in C4D. I moved on to expand my pipeline with external tools like Marvelous Designer and Embergen. It's true, you need to spend a little more time for setup and preparation (and of course, there's additional organizational overhead with files and versions). But for me, it's really worth the (managable) extra hassle since the quality is just better. And I have more fun 🙂 btw, Embergen has a free trial period. Please, just try it out, and you will see 🙂 (And, just in case: I'm just an excited user, this is not an ad in any way 😅)

They seem to have a lot of work still ahead, but the first teaser of Liquigen is quite promising: Realtime liquids: In case you haven't yet tried Embergen, their realtime fire&smoke sim - do try! It has a great UI, thanks to it's realtime approach you can cram a ton of artistic decisions into a session, and interoperability via VDBs is quite okay. But above all, it's plain fun 🙂 I'll never touch xParticles/Explosia again 😅

Ah... so, if I understand correctly, a voxel in the background should have only 2 states: 1. Completely in the light OR 2. Complety in the dark (shadowed) ...Like a pixel with two luminance states. Then how about this: - Build the wall from voxels - Assign individual color materials - The base color (for example, diffuse) should be the shadow color - quite dark - Now give the material a strong Subsurface Scattering color. Now, when a voxel is in the shadow (not hit by light source), it should stay dark (the shadow color defined in diffuse) When a voxel is hit by light source, it should light up complety, due to SSS. With a medium SSS setting, you could even produce some kind of "pixel flickering" like dithering in pixel art. ... it's just a theory, though 🙂

Just an idea: - Start with approach 1 - Lower the output resolution to something like 160x100 - Carefully position the Camera, so that a voxel roughly equals an output-pixel (you could make an overlay for the camera with a grid of output-pixels) - Everything including shadows should now be pixelated - Upres in post as needed (without filtering for "clean" pixel look)

No, I wasn't aware of C4D-Usermeetings around town... but I would actually be super-interested in joining, as soon as the situation allows. "Normal" friends tend to be bored soon enough by 3D talk 😅

Gerresheim, far in the east 🙂

Hi Marc, greetings from the other side of Düsseldorf! The world is a pie 😅

Wow! Totally surprising, and a real power-move. Whenever I dip into zBrush, I get lost in that labyrinthic GUI and also step in a thousand pitfalls. But when actually sculpting, it's simply peerless. So organic, so responsive, so natural. I guess, the new acquisitions will live unaltered alongside each other for quite a while, but it's obvious now, that Maxon builds it's own CreativeCloud now. Not sure about the Forger buy now that they acquired the big one, but ok. Let's see 🙂

I'm not a Blender user, but from the outside, that's looking like a massively useful update! Have fun, guys! 🙂

Yeah, from the outside, Insydium fits so obviously, that there must be a deeper reason that they haven't been bought yet. Maybe it's money, maybe it doesn't fit with Maxon's core-rewrite/scene-node strategy, maybe their tech has a hard performance ceiling... who knows...

I'm tempted, too. But when looking at tutorials, it seems just like another grave to bury fiddling-time 😄 Also, Explosia is of course far worse performance-wise, but it's so neatly integrated with the rest of x-particles. I just hope, Insydium gets their GPU-support up and running sometime... ( I think it was promised to the end of 2020, wasn't it?)